<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Active Directory Authentication for Ruby on Rails</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zorched.net/2007/06/04/active-directory-authentication-for-ruby-on-rails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zorched.net/2007/06/04/active-directory-authentication-for-ruby-on-rails/</link>
	<description>Musings of a software developer in Milwaukee, WI.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Someone @ wellcare.com</title>
		<link>http://www.zorched.net/2007/06/04/active-directory-authentication-for-ruby-on-rails/comment-page-1/#comment-11124</link>
		<dc:creator>Someone @ wellcare.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zorched.net/2007/06/04/active-directory-authentication-for-ruby-on-rails/#comment-11124</guid>
		<description>Why would you deisgn a solution that is both insecure and using legacy interfaces.  A much better solution would be to use kerberos authentication.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would you deisgn a solution that is both insecure and using legacy interfaces.  A much better solution would be to use kerberos authentication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Lane</title>
		<link>http://www.zorched.net/2007/06/04/active-directory-authentication-for-ruby-on-rails/comment-page-1/#comment-10830</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 01:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zorched.net/2007/06/04/active-directory-authentication-for-ruby-on-rails/#comment-10830</guid>
		<description>Dan,
I was using Apache 2.0, so I used the pre-compiled mod_auth_sspi binaries. Seems like InstantRails needs to upgrade, Apache 2 has been out for years now and 2.2 has been out for months at least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan,<br />
I was using Apache 2.0, so I used the pre-compiled mod_auth_sspi binaries. Seems like InstantRails needs to upgrade, Apache 2 has been out for years now and 2.2 has been out for months at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.zorched.net/2007/06/04/active-directory-authentication-for-ruby-on-rails/comment-page-1/#comment-10829</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 23:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zorched.net/2007/06/04/active-directory-authentication-for-ruby-on-rails/#comment-10829</guid>
		<description>Nice article.  I did not see mod_auth_sspi.so binaries for the version of apache packaged with InstantRails (it uses apache 1.3.33).  Did you build your own modules for 1.3.33 or are you just running apache2 using scgi?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article.  I did not see mod_auth_sspi.so binaries for the version of apache packaged with InstantRails (it uses apache 1.3.33).  Did you build your own modules for 1.3.33 or are you just running apache2 using scgi?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
