<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: .NET Makes Me Mad (Generics and Collections edition)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zorched.net/2007/02/01/net-makes-me-mad-generics-and-collections-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zorched.net/2007/02/01/net-makes-me-mad-generics-and-collections-edition/</link>
	<description>Musings of a software developer in Milwaukee, WI.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ragnar</title>
		<link>http://www.zorched.net/2007/02/01/net-makes-me-mad-generics-and-collections-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-10835</link>
		<dc:creator>Ragnar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zorched.net/2007/02/01/net-makes-me-mad-generics-and-collections-edition/#comment-10835</guid>
		<description>Yes, I agree its stupid that Microsoft has not supplied sets and bags with .NET. Maybe there are open source alternatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I agree its stupid that Microsoft has not supplied sets and bags with .NET. Maybe there are open source alternatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.zorched.net/2007/02/01/net-makes-me-mad-generics-and-collections-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-6214</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 21:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zorched.net/2007/02/01/net-makes-me-mad-generics-and-collections-edition/#comment-6214</guid>
		<description>I really don't like the virtual, new, and override keywords.  There must have been some sort of reasoning behind having to explicitly label the methods and properties you want to override but I can't see it.  Its a feature for those that like to plan ahead and limit the abilities of other developers.  Its slows you done when you're doing coding time design.  Thank god for resharper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t like the virtual, new, and override keywords.  There must have been some sort of reasoning behind having to explicitly label the methods and properties you want to override but I can&#8217;t see it.  Its a feature for those that like to plan ahead and limit the abilities of other developers.  Its slows you done when you&#8217;re doing coding time design.  Thank god for resharper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
